Share
This blog post aims to provide engineering professionals and product designers with actionable insights to optimize their CNC machining designs for cost efficiency. Drawing from Rapid Enterprises’ 40+ years of precision machining experience, we’ll identify the most common design mistakes that unnecessarily inflate manufacturing costs and provide practical solutions to avoid them. By implementing these Design for Manufacturing (DFM) principles, you can reduce production costs by up to 35% while maintaining the quality and precision your products require.
When designing parts for CNC machining, many engineers focus solely on functionality while overlooking how design choices impact manufacturability and cost. At Rapid Enterprises, where we operate by the philosophy of “Do it once, Do it right,” we’ve seen countless projects where minor design adjustments could have saved significant time and money. In this post, we’ll examine five critical design mistakes that increase CNC machining costs and provide proven strategies to avoid them.
Unnecessary Tight Tolerances
Poor Material Selection for Specific Applications
Inefficient Geometry for Machining
Ignoring Tool Access Considerations
Overlooking Post-Processing Requirements
The Problem:
One of the most common and costly errors is specifying tighter tolerances than necessary. While precision to “a ten-thousandth of an inch” is achievable (and something we pride ourselves on at Rapid Enterprises), demanding these tight tolerances across an entire part dramatically increases machining time, requires specialized tooling, and necessitates additional quality control steps.
Cost Impact:
Tolerances tighter than ±0.005″ can increase machining costs by 30-50% compared to standard tolerances (±0.010″). Each incremental tightening of tolerance requirements exponentially increases production time and scrap rates.
How to Avoid It:
Pro Tip: At Rapid Enterprises, we often help clients identify which features truly require tight tolerances and which can be relaxed without compromising performance, typically reducing costs by 20-30% with no impact on functionality.
The Problem:
Choosing materials based solely on mechanical properties without considering machinability leads to excessive tool wear, longer cycle times, and higher scrap rates. For example, using titanium when aluminum would suffice for non-critical applications adds unnecessary cost.
Cost Impact:
Materials like titanium can cost 3-5x more to machine than aluminum due to slower cutting speeds, specialized tooling requirements, and increased tool wear. Even within the same material family (e.g., aluminum 6061 vs. 7075), machining costs can vary by 25%.
How to Avoid It:
Real-World Example: A client designing a non-structural housing component initially specified stainless steel 316. After consultation, we recommended aluminum 6061-T6, which reduced machining time by 65% and material costs by 40% while still meeting all performance requirements.
The Problem:
Designing parts with complex internal features, deep cavities, or intricate undercuts that require specialized tooling or multiple setups significantly increases production complexity and cost.
Cost Impact:
Parts requiring 5-axis machining instead of 3-axis can cost 2-3x more. Each additional setup can add $150-$300 to the production cost per part. Deep cavities (depth > 4x tool diameter) can increase machining time by 50-100%.
How to Avoid It:
Pro Tip: When Rapid Enterprises reviews CAD designs, we often suggest minor geometry modifications that maintain functionality while dramatically improving machinability. These tweaks typically reduce costs by 25-40% with minimal design impact.
The Problem:
Designing features that are inaccessible to standard cutting tools forces the use of specialized, expensive tooling or requires custom fixture solutions, both of which drive up costs.
Cost Impact:
Custom tooling can add $500-$2,000 to setup costs and increase per-part costs by 15-30%. Features requiring tool approach angles less than 5 degrees can double machining time.
How to Avoid It:
Design Insight: At Rapid Enterprises, our “Do it once, Do it right” philosophy means we examine tool access during the design review phase. We recently assisted a medical device client in modifying a component by increasing the internal radius from 0.02″ to 0.06″, which eliminated the need for custom tooling and resulted in a 32% cost reduction.
The Problem:
Failing to consider secondary operations like heat treatment, surface finishing, or assembly during the design phase creates complications that increase costs and extend lead times.
Cost Impact:
Unplanned secondary operations can add 20-50% to the total part cost. Design features that complicate finishing (like complex internal geometries requiring manual polishing) can increase finishing costs by 100% or more.
How to Avoid It:
Case Study: A defense industry client designed a component requiring hard anodizing, but didn’t account for how the finish would affect tight tolerance interfaces. After consultation with our team, they modified the design to include sacrificial material in critical areas that could be removed after finishing, saving $18,000 in rework costs for their 200-part production run.
Designing for CNC machining requires balancing functional requirements with manufacturing realities. By avoiding these five common design mistakes, you can significantly reduce production costs while maintaining the quality and precision your products demand. At Rapid Enterprises, with over 40 years of precision machining experience, we’ve helped countless clients optimize their designs for cost-effective manufacturing.
Remember, the most successful manufacturing partnerships begin with collaboration during the design phase. Our engineering team works closely with clients to identify potential cost drivers early, ensuring your parts are designed for optimal manufacturability without compromising performance.
As Arman Pouragha, President of Rapid Enterprises, states: “We are only as good as our last job; and we assure our last job is excellent.” This commitment to excellence extends to our design consultation services, where we help you “Do it once, Do it right” from the very beginning of your project.
Ready to optimize your next CNC machining project? Contact Rapid Enterprises today for a free design consultation and discover how thoughtful design choices can reduce your manufacturing costs while maintaining the highest quality standards.
Q: How much can I realistically save by optimizing my CNC machining design?
A: Most clients see a 20-35% cost reduction by addressing the design mistakes outlined in this article. The exact savings depend on your specific part complexity, material, and production volume. At Rapid Enterprises, we provide a detailed cost analysis during our free design consultation.
Q: Should I always design to the tightest possible tolerances for critical components?
A: No. Even for critical components, only specify tight tolerances where functionally necessary. Over-specifying tolerances across the entire part unnecessarily increases costs. Use GD&T to apply tight tolerances only to critical features while maintaining standard tolerances elsewhere.
Q: How early in the design process should I involve my CNC machining partner?
A: The earlier, the better. Involving your machining partner during the conceptual design phase allows for the most significant cost savings. We recommend engagement before finalizing CAD models to maximize design for manufacturability benefits.
Q: Can you machine complex geometries without increasing costs significantly?
A: Some complexity is unavoidable, but we can often suggest design modifications that maintain functionality while improving machinability. For example, adding small radii to sharp internal corners or adjusting cavity depths can dramatically reduce the need for specialized tooling and multiple setups.
Q: How do I know if my material selection is optimal for CNC machining?
A: The best approach is to consult with your machining partner during material selection. Factors to consider include machinability rating, tool wear characteristics, cutting speeds/feeds, and availability. We provide material selection guidance based on decades of experience with various alloys and composites.
CNC Machining has been stated to be one of the most versatile methods of production, but converting it into a cost-effective one requires something more than mere machinery that is optimized. One factor that goes unnoticed most of the time is the material selected.
A decade ago, manufacturers faced potential threats like rising wages in low-cost regions, fragmented customer demand, and a scarcity of skilled talent. The Great Recession of 2008–2009
CNC machine shop owners and operators with actionable strategies to understand their customers better. By emphasizing the importance of customer knowledge, Target market, gathering customers feedback and building strong relationships.
Monday to Friday
7:00 AM – 5:00 PM
